10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (2024)

Movie

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (1)

By Jeremy Urquhart

Updated

Your changes have been saved

Email is sent

Email has already been sent

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Manage Your List

Follow

Followed

Follow with Notifications

Follow

Unfollow

Link copied to clipboard

Sign in to your Collider account

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (2)

Bringing a film to life is tough work, and naturally, various things can go wrong while making one. Inevitably, many films with difficult productions end up with a less-than-satisfying final result. Most things need to go right for a film to effectively "work," and it's fair to expect that most films that don't end up working probably aren't worth your time and/or hard-earned money.

✕ Remove Ads

That being said, there are benefits to watching movies that aren't generally considered "good." They can help you appreciate great films more, they can serve as "so bad they're good," or they can be failures in ways that are interesting to watch. Not every poorly reviewed movie is unwatchable or boring, and there's an argument to be made that the following 10 films - despite all featuring Rotten Tomatoes scores under 10% - are actually worth watching.

10 'Jack and Jill' (2011)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 3%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (3)

Adam Sandler is a talented actor who's shown his acting chops - both serious and comedic - in a handful of great movies throughout his career. Not included among those great movies is Jack and Jill, though, which sees Sandler playing both title characters: an everyday man, Jack, and his obnoxious twin sister, Jill, who threatens to derail his life when she makes her way back into it.

✕ Remove Ads

It misses so much comedy-wise that it might actually serve as a solid anti-comedy. For masochistic fans of bad comedy, it's kind of awe-inspiring how lazy most of Jack and Jill's jokes are, which of course makes it all the more surprising when you get the rare joke that actually works. Most come courtesy of Al Pacino, whose extended cameo as himself is easily the film's bright spot, thanks to its sheer absurdity and Pacino's bombastic performance.

Jack and Jill

PG

Release Date
November 11, 2011

Director
Dennis Dugan
Cast
Adam Sandler , Al Pacino , Elodie Tougne , Rohan Chand , Eugenio Derbez , David Spade

Runtime
91

Rent on Apple TV

9 'Movie 43' (2013)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 4%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (4)

✕ Remove Ads

No matter how inconsistent sketch comedy movies might be, none look as bad as Movie 43. At least with most movies that are made up of various skits, you can expect a handful to be funny... but Movie 43 features 14 comedic short films overall, and honestly, none of them are particularly funny.

There's a ton of talent involved, too, when it comes to the directors, writers, and actors who worked on these various sketches. The behind-the-scenes story of how this absolute mess of a movie came to be is far more interesting than the film itself, but of course, it's a story best appreciated once you've endured - or at least tried to endure - one of the worst comedies in recent memory. It's quite wild that Movie 43 even exists, which can make it genuinely intriguing, even if it's a difficult film to actually finish.

Movie 43

R

Release Date
January 1, 2013
Director
Elizabeth Banks , Steven Brill , Steve Carr , Rusty Cundieff , James Duffy , Griffin Dunne
Cast
Dennis Quaid , Greg Kinnear , Common , Charlie Saxton , Will Sasso , Odessa Rae

Runtime
97

✕ Remove Ads

Rent on Apple TV

8 'Left Behind' (2014)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 0%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (5)

Nicolas Cage has had a very inconsistent career, as he's appeared in numerous great movies and just as many bad ones throughout his almost 40 years in the business. Still, Left Behind might be the worst of all, which is really saying something, as it's a post-apocalyptic science-fiction movie that doesn't work at all.

The premise is interesting, at least. It kicks off with a mass disappearance of millions of people worldwide in a possible religious rapture, with those "left behind" on Earth forced to deal with the chaos that ensues. However, Left Behind is unfortunately just too inept to be a genuinely exciting sci-fi/thriller, but holds value for being so bad it's good in parts, earning a cautious recommendation for its unintentional humor alone... though viewers should be prepared for some boring moments throughout.

✕ Remove Ads

Left Behind

PG-13

Release Date
October 3, 2014

Director
Vic Armstrong
Cast
Nicolas Cage , Chad Michael Murray , Lea Thompson , Nicky Whelan , Martin Klebba , Quinton Aaron , Jordin Sparks , Gary Grubbs

Runtime
110 Minutes

Watch on Roku

7 'Pinocchio' (2002)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 0%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (6)

There have been plenty of film adaptations of Pinocchio throughout film history, but none have been as poorly received as Roberto Benigni's take on the classic story in 2002. Benigni produced, wrote, directed, and - most bizarrely of all - starred in the film's title role as a puppet who longs to be a real boy... despite Benigni being 50 years old at the time of its release.

✕ Remove Ads

Its baffling creative choices render it unsuccessful as a family film, but it ends up working as an accidental horror film because of how uncanny it is. For those who find the idea of a strangely energetic middle-aged man playing Pinocchio unsettling, this might well work as an unexpectedly good choice to put on for a solid dose of unnerving horror. Those who want a good Pinocchio movie might be better off sticking to the 2022 Guillermo del Toro version while also avoiding the Robert Zemeckis-directed take on the character from the same year.

Watch on Hoopla

6 'Jaws: The Revenge' (1987)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 0%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (7)

✕ Remove Ads

Jaws: The Revenge is the fourth film in a series that probably shouldn't have ever been a series at all, even if the first sequel to Jaws is generally thought of as decent. You can feel Jaws: The Revenge struggle to sustain its ridiculous story for every minute of its runtime, and it makes for an interesting - albeit frustrating - watch.

Essentially, it's the shark who wants revenge, and it travels a ridiculously far distance to target Ellen Brody and her family. Jaws: The Revenge makes for a truly silly and clunky movie, but at least the stupider moments are entertaining. The movie is only 90 minutes long, and Michael Caine is in it. Sure, it's far from a great Michael Caine movie, but he's fun here as always, and Caine's comments on Jaws: The Revenge are also quite amusing, making him overall one of the few potentially redeeming factors of the film.

Jaws: The Revenge

PG-13

Release Date
July 17, 1987

Director
Joseph Sargent
Cast
Lorraine Gary , Michael Caine , Mario Van Peebles , Lance Guest , Karen Young , Judith Barsi , Lynn Whitfield , Mitchell Anderson

Runtime
89 minutes

✕ Remove Ads

Rent on Apple TV

5 '88 Minutes' (2007)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 5%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (8)

A crash course in how not to make an action-thriller, 88 Minutes is unbelievably inept. It stars one of the all-time greats, Al Pacino, and features what sounds like a decent premise: a forensic psychiatrist is tormented and hunted by a mysterious serial killer, who tells Pacino's character that he has less than 90 minutes to live (hence the title).

It even takes place in almost exact real-time, which you think would keep the pacing consistently tight and exciting, but the execution is completely off. Almost nothing about 88 Minutes works, so really, it holds value if you want to learn how not to write a thriller, and/or find humor in movies that fundamentally don't work on just about every front. Al Pacino has been in countless great movies throughout his lengthy and accomplished career, but 88 Minutes really can't be counted as one of them.

✕ Remove Ads

88 minutes

R

Release Date
February 14, 2007

Director
Jon Avnet
Cast
Al Pacino , Alicia Witt , Leelee Sobieski , Amy Brenneman , William Forsythe , Deborah Kara Unger , Ben McKenzie , Neal McDonough , Leah Cairns , Stephen Moyer , Christopher Redman , Brendan Fletcher , Paul Campbell , Tim Perez , Bob Stephenson , Mike Dopud , Philip Moon , Marcus Hondro , Michael Eklund , Trilby Glover , Damien Leake , Kristina Copeland , Tammy Hui , Vicky Huang , Victoria Tennant

Runtime
108 minutes

Rent on Apple TV

4 'Battlefield Earth' (2000)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 3%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (9)

A notorious box office disaster that likely hurt the careers of most involved, Battlefield Earth is one of the most bizarre and outwardly bad science fiction movies of all time. It tells a messy story about the human race being enslaved by a supposedly advanced alien race, features shoddy special effects, and presents most of its shots using nauseating Dutch angles.

✕ Remove Ads

Thankfully, it's the kind of bad that's funny more often than not. Stretches of the film may prove challenging, and you do really feel every single one of its 117 minutes... however, it's worth it for the hilarious dialogue and John Travolta's scenery-devouring performance as the film's main villain. Battlefield Earth is considered one of the worst movies of the 21st century so far for good reason, and that makes it arguably one of the best of the best when it comes to so-bad-they're-good movies.

Battlefield Earth

PG-13

Release Date
May 12, 2000

Director
Roger Christian
Cast
John Travolta , Forest Whitaker , Barry Pepper , Kim Coates

Runtime
118 minutes

Rent on Apple TV

3 'Sir Billi' (2012)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 0%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (10)

✕ Remove Ads

It might be a shame that this ended up being the last role of the legendary Sean Connery: voicing the main character in a strange CGI-animated family film about a vet's adventures with a group of talking animals, and that said last role ended up getting a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

But is Sir Billi really that bad? Honestly, not really. Is it good? Also not really, but it's kind of fascinating, and rather than being called "so bad it's good," it might deserve to be labeled "so bizarre it's good." The humor is weird, the animation is often uncanny and creepy, and the whole vibe is just bizarre and even surreal. As far as poorly-made animated family movies go, Sir Billi is probably one of the "best," and the bizarreness of its mere existence at all can be amusing, despite - or maybe because of - how off it all feels.

✕ Remove Ads

Watch on Vudu

2 'Mac and Me' (1988)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 7%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (11)

Mac and Me is probably one of the best-known notoriously bad family films. It's seen by most as a fairly blatant rip-off of 1982's E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, which is one of the main reasons for its paltry 7% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

And citing it as a lesser version of E.T. is a fair assessment, as Mac and Me also features a story about an alien who befriends a young American boy after being separated from its own family. Still, it's worth watching for the bragging rights of being able to say you survived Mac and Me, as well as for the fact that no matter what, it will make you appreciate the classic E.T. even more. Those who want a good mash-up of science fiction and family-friendly coming-of-age narratives might want to stick with E.T., but Mac and Me is a movie that makes for an amusing contrast.

✕ Remove Ads

Mac and Me

PG

Release Date
August 12, 1988

Director
Stewart Raffill

Cast
Jade Calegory , Lauren Stanley , Christine Ebersole , Jonathan Ward , Tina Caspary

Runtime
95 Minutes

Watch on Amazon Prime

1 'Gotti' (2018)

Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 0%

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (12)

Gotti's0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes is notorious and even something of a meme. It even became part of the film's marketing, where it wore the 0% rating as an odd badge of pride, suggesting that reviewers were biased and didn't know what they were talking about, and that everyday viewers would in turn be more receptive.

✕ Remove Ads

Truthfully, it probably just has zero positive reviews from critics because it's really bad. It's another messy film that stands as a shining example of how not to tackle a particular genre; in this case, the crime film. It's poorly assembled, badly paced, and doesn't exactly feature strong acting... yet does thankfully end up being bad enough to cross over into the realm of so bad it's good. Gotti is not a good crime movie or a well-made biographical film by any means, but it is a fascinating train wreck of a film.

Gotti

R

Release Date
June 14, 2018
Director
Kevin Connolly
Cast
John Travolta , Kelly Preston , Stacy Keach , Pruitt Taylor Vince , Megan Leonard , Lydia Hull

Runtime
112 Minutes

Watch on Hulu

NEXT: Movies That Are Perfect From Start to Finish

✕ Remove Ads

  • Movie

Your changes have been saved

Email is sent

Email has already been sent

You’ve reached your account maximum for followed topics.

Manage Your List

Follow

Followed

Follow with Notifications

Follow

Unfollow

10 Movies Below 10% On Rotten Tomatoes That Are Actually Worth Watching (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Otha Schamberger

Last Updated:

Views: 5465

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Otha Schamberger

Birthday: 1999-08-15

Address: Suite 490 606 Hammes Ferry, Carterhaven, IL 62290

Phone: +8557035444877

Job: Forward IT Agent

Hobby: Fishing, Flying, Jewelry making, Digital arts, Sand art, Parkour, tabletop games

Introduction: My name is Otha Schamberger, I am a vast, good, healthy, cheerful, energetic, gorgeous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.